Consider what you
would do you if you did not have health insurance
or if you had a Health Savings Account.
I remember when there was no dental insurance. You went to
the dentist
and you wrote a check for the bill. Now many people have dental insurance
and have to check whether the dentist is on the plan, what is covered, etc.
The dentist in turn has to enroll in and track dozens of insurance plans.
The result is a bureaucratic morass that adds to the cost of the system overall.
Dental insurance is appealing to employees who receive the coverage
as an employee benefit. To them it seems like a free benefit.
By its nature, insurance restricts choice, rewarding some
providers and penalizing others.
Traditional insurance rewards traditional medicine and traditional
pharmaceuticals.
As health savings accounts become more common, consumers will have more choice.
Depending on how HSA plans are written, HSAs may enable consumers to choose
to spend healthcare dollars on alternative medicine treatments such as massage,
acupuncture, and Pilates classes. They may enable reimbursement of supplements
such as herbs, vitamins, and hormone therapies. They may even cover spas, health
clubs,
and weight loss programs. Psychotherapy, which is often only covered at 50% and
then
only with managed care authorization, would no longer be capped or micromanaged.
Personal coaching might even be covered.
There is an terrible inequity in the current system in
that those who pay cash
(relieving the healthcare practitioners of large, cumbersome billing expenses)
end up
paying more as they don’t get the discounts insurance companies demand.
As HSAs become more common, consumers will insist on not paying more than
doctors
charge insurance companies. They may (and should) even insist on cash discounts.
HSAs save money by greatly reducing (but not eliminating)
the bureaucratieaucratic overhead.
They give the consumer more choice. They will ultimately separate employment
from healthcare,
making it easier to change jobs. The primary downside is that employees often
see HSAs
as an attempt by management to cut costs by reducing benefits (as is sometimes
the case).
Paul Zane Pilzer says 90% of people can purchase healthcare insurance for half
of what
it cost employers and once purchased it cannot be cancelled or raised beyond
normal
cost increases. This can be a wonderful solution to many individuals, especially
those who currently do not have healthcare insurance. At a macro level, however,
it is a shell
game as costs for the 10% with serious health problems are shifted to government
funding.
As
you have probably gathered, my libertarian penchant likes HSAs while my ultimate
preference would be insurance for catastrophic events and out of pocket payment
for everything else.
The question is: If you had an HSA instead of your current insurance, would you
spend
healthcare funds differently? If so, what has been your personal cost of not
pursuing the healthcare
choices that you consider optimal? What choices would you make if you had the
money your employer
currently spends on insurance and you had to pay for all of your medical
expenses out of pocket?
Most Americans receive health insurance from their
employers and lose their health
insurance when they lose their jobs, but that's about to change....Employer
sponsored
healthcare will be mostly eliminated in the next twenty years.
~Paul Zane Pilzer, author of The New Healthcare Insurance Solution
Discussion on a blog: "Government today restricts our
medical choices in countless ways,
direct and indirect, which has led many to call for a Canadian style,
single-payer system.
Sorta homeopathic, isn’t it? A LARGER dose of the poison that’s killing us will
actually
be the cure."
Another reader astutely commented, "Actually that’s allopathy."
[Homeopathic
medicine uses minute quantities of toxins to produce cures;
allopathy is traditional medicine.]
~from DB's Medical Rants,
www.medrants.com
A man awakened after emergency heart bypass surgery to find
himself
at a Catholic Hospital. A nun asked him how he was going to pay.
He explained that he did not have any health insurance or savings.
"Do you have any relatives who could help?" asked the nun.
"I only have a spinster sister, who is a nun," He replied.
Angrily, the nun
protested, "Nuns are not spinsters! Nuns are married to God."
The patient replied, "Then send the bill to my brother-in-law."
This article was from:
Anti-Aging
PsychologyThe following newsletter articles may be reprinted in E-zines, newsletters, newspapers, and magazines provided they the content is not edited and the attribution below is given. Formatting may be changed and you may use one of the web site pictures of the author to accompany the article.
"Dr. Michael Brickey, The Anti-Aging Psychologist, teaches people to think, feel, look and be more youthful. He is an inspiring keynote speaker and Oprah-featured author. His works include: Defy Aging, 52 Baby Steps to grow young, and Reverse Aging (anti-aging hypnosis CDs). Visit www.NotAging.com for a free report on anti-aging secrets and a free newsletter with practical anti-aging tips."